CheqqAn operations department that does not need chasing.
Every operation is a set of steps someone remembers to do. Describe yours and Cheqq builds the whole thing — intake, process, escalation, reporting — as something that runs deterministically and asks for you only when it should.
Say it, and it exists
Each of these started as one sentence. Yours starts the same way.
| SKU | On hand | Weekly | Cover | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NW-1180 | 412 | 38 | 10.8 wks | Hold |
| NW-2240 | 96 | 44 | 2.2 wks | Reorder |
| NW-3105 | 1,204 | 61 | 19.7 wks | Hold |
| NW-4420 | 38 | 27 | 1.4 wks | Reorder |
| NW-5090 | 560 | 35 | 16.0 wks | Hold |
Reorder before you notice you should have.
It compares what you hold against how fast it moves, works out what runs out first, and raises the order — so the shortage is caught by the system rather than by a customer.
A reporting flow the whole team will actually use.
Anyone reports in a form, the right person is paged, the clock starts, and the follow-up writes itself. Built by describing how your escalation is supposed to work.
Turn a mess of emails into something you can run on.
Twenty senders, twenty formats, one delivery schedule you are supposed to keep. It reads them into a single shape and tells you what is late before it becomes your problem.
An internal tool without an internal tools team.
Shift swaps, holiday requests, kit bookings — the small apps that never justify a sprint. Live at their own address in an afternoon, reading and writing your real records.
Automation that still knows when to stop.
The riskier a step, the more it should hesitate. Require a named signature, escalate when someone is away, and treat a refusal as an outcome the process handles rather than an error.
One set of records, however each person needs it.
A board for the floor, a table for you, a dashboard for whoever asks. There are no exports to keep in step, because there is only ever one copy underneath.
Everything an operator needs, in one workspace
The data, the process that acts on it and the report about it are the same system — so they cannot drift apart.
Plugs into what you already use
Connect once, then use them from any automation — no exports, no copy-pasting.
- monday.comKeep boards in step with the process that feeds them.
- GmailTake work in by email and reply on the same thread.
- Google SheetsRead the sheet someone still maintains, and write back to it.
- LinearOpen and update issues as part of a process.
- AtlassianRaise Jira issues and update Confluence pages as part of a process.
- Webhooks & MCPAnything that can call a URL can start a workflow.
Not listed? Bring any REST API or MCP server.
Questions from operations
How is this different from Zapier or Make?
Those connect other people's tools to each other. Cheqq owns the data as well, so a process reads and writes its own records rather than shuttling rows between apps — and you build it by describing it, not by wiring a canvas.
What happens when a step fails?
You choose: stop, continue past it, or unwind the work already done with a compensation step. Every run keeps its full event history, and suspended runs can be resumed rather than restarted.
Can I see what a workflow will do before it runs?
Yes — that is the point of compiling it into steps. You can read the whole sequence on the canvas, test individual steps with mock inputs, and do a dry run before switching it on.
Does the whole team need accounts?
No. Collaborators get roles, but you can also publish a form or a status board as an app so people can submit and check things without a seat.
Do it once. Then never again
Describe the routine you keep repeating and watch it become something you can read. Free to start.
Start free